When Greg Flickinger moved from his role as vice president of manufacturing at snack food maker Snyder’s-Lance to take up a similar position at HEB in 2016, he came armed with a set of tools and checklists from PMMI’s OpX Leadership Network.
Flickinger knew that these tools could help HEB achieve improvements in its manufacturing processes to enable it to operate more efficiently and ultimately save the company money, just as they had at his previous employer. That’s because he had helped create them.
Building a better industry
The Operational Excellence (OpX) Leadership Network got underway at PMMI, Automation World’s parent organization, in 2011. It took on its current form and name in 2014, according to Tom Egan, vice president for industry services at PMMI. Flickinger began work with OpX early in its development, along with PMMI’s Steve Schlegel and Steve Perry, to facilitate and manage the program. Flickinger now serves as chair of the OpX Leadership Network Executive Council.
For Flickinger, the group represented a continuation of the work he had done while at General Mills, where he and colleagues shared best practices across the company and its suppliers. In the OpX Leadership Network, he saw the opportunity to advance the operational excellence of not just a single company, but of an entire industry.
Until the advent of the OpX Leadership Network, consumer packaged goods (CPG) manufacturers and the OEMs that served them had little common ground on which to improve their processes and work together. The resulting inefficiencies ultimately ended up costing companies time and money. “Companies have all had different specifications in machinery and tend not to have the resources to keep up with changes,” explains John Kowal, director of business development at B&R Industrial Automation. “I've had machine builders tell me that they can spend $4,000 in engineering time just reviewing a spec and calling out exceptions.”
The OpX Leadership Network is dedicated to solving this and other problems caused by inexact or non-existent specifications and processes. “It's not about a competitive advantage,” Kowal explains. “It's about operating more efficiently.”
To that end, the tools offered by the OpX Leadership Network on its website—free of charge—help operations managers save time and money at the three major stages of setting up and operating an assembly line. These are at the planning stage; during factory acceptance testing; and during operations.
To start, managers can deploy the OpX Leadership Network’s total cost of ownership (TCO) checklist to help them and their organizations select the best and most cost-effective equipment for their planned lines. From there, the factory acceptance test (FAT) checklist helps them iron out any bugs before installing the line. The overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) starter tool and OEE benefits calculator help ensure efficient operations once the line is up and running.
The TCO checklist
Kowal likens the TCO checklist to an umbrella, providing the overreaching guidelines that can save both manufacturers and OEMs time and money when planning new lines. For example, using the TCO checklist as a guide, everyone involved can agree on key elements such as requirements for electrical systems, sanitary design, and even how to divide up the work of training for operations between the manufacturer and the OEM.
The best way to deploy the TCO checklist, Kowal says, is to introduce it at the onset of discussions for building a new line. “Put it on the table right up front and say, ‘Here's a tool for us to go through what our expectations are of the machine. Then you can tell us any questions you've got, but also if there are any areas that need clarification.’”
The TCO checklist’s major strength lies in reducing the total cost of ownership. Even though a given system might cost more initially, its savings over time—if known—can be a more important consideration for the purchase decision. “So if you have a centralized system, where you sense the lubricant level and replenish automatically, that might cost more,” Kowal explains. “But when you're looking at not just initial cost, but at total cost of ownership over time, that could be a big savings.”
That goes for evaluating improvements to existing lines as well as for installing new ones. “We can go into existing equipment and apply the TCO principles to find out how much that equipment is really costing us,” Flickinger says. “It helps us figure out what equipment should be replaced. Think about TCO as your starting point.”
And after that starting point, manufacturers can turn to the FAT checklist to help ensure that a new line meets expectations.
The FAT checklist
The goal of factory acceptance testing is to simulate production conditions and find weaknesses before they cause problems in operations. Egan recalls a company he worked with that went as far as to dress workers in the coats they would need to wear when producing refrigerated products during factory acceptance testing.