Ethernet networking: The values and the pitfalls

Aug. 4, 2009
Industrial Ethernet has been the source of a great deal of discussion over the past few years. Proponents, and there are many, seem to believe it is the shop floor equivalent of a perfect world. Everything changes; you reduce -- or even eliminate -- cabling, you get more diagnostics, more control, it’s cheaper, it’s less proprietary. 

Ethernet also has its opponents. They claim Industrial Ethernet is too new to be trusted on the plant floor, or that it’s too expensive when compared to field bus technology. These are just a few of the misconceptions surrounding Industrial Ethernet.

To start with, Ethernet is not new. The basic technology has been around for more than 30 years and today’s industrial offerings build on that foundation, adding key functionalities that provide the determinism, reliability and ease-of-use required for the plant-floor.

As for the cost issue: Initial implementation costs are about the same as field bus. You use most of the same components – PLCs, I/O, cables and connectors – but you use an Ethernet switch instead of a field bus node. This gives you a common infrastructure that will support most any device you want to connect. It also makes it easier to connect to the office network and provide senior managers with visibility and control over the operation enhancing their ability to respond rapidly to customer demands and leaving you with one network to maintain rather than two or more.

That single, open infrastructure is very important, says Jeremy Bryant, Industrial Communications manager with Siemens Energy & Automation. “You used to get locked into a given protocol and that would dictate some of the options you would have regarding equipment. With Ethernet it’s not dedicated, you don’t need a special port, just one standard cable.  This leads into one of the other major advantages, being connectivity.

“It’s a lot like having a phone today. As long as you speak the same language you can talk to anyone around the world. Furthermore the same phone system can be used independent of the language.”

In the long run, that common infrastructure will drive down your total cost of ownership because you will no longer need specialists for each type of field bus in use. Ethernet also allows for more effective monitoring tools, giving you get enhanced intelligence, control and troubleshooting.

Some proponents point to the fact that you need less cabling than with field bus, but that isn’t really significant when compared to the other benefits.

There’s another critical misconception, says Raj Rajani, an Ethernet Marketing Manager with Siemens Energy & Automation. “People think it’s too complicated; that you always have to have IT people and IT knowledge to set up your network. That’s a product of the fact that some IT networks are very complicated to set up. Our industrial Ethernet networks are designed to be set up by automation engineers. You don’t need to learn a new language.”

“The cold fact is that because the basic network configurations are the same your field bus expertise is highly transferable” he adds.

For these reasons, and others, Ethernet is gradually replacing the likes of Profibus and DeviceNet and becoming the industry standard. ARC Advisory Group pegged the market at one million nodes in 2007 and forecasted it would grow to more than three million by 2012.

So, having made the decision to join the growing horde and migrate to Ethernet, what should you do next? Siemens networking consultant Marty Jansons has a four step approach to implementing Industrial Ethernet networks.

The first step is preplanning which, Jansons emphasizes, is the most important of the tasks.

“Look at how many devices need to be connected to the network. And plan for the future. What new initiatives am I going to want to implement in the future. How many ports do I need to support growth? Do I want to lay the groundwork for wireless? Future proof the design to some extent.”

Step two is proof of concept. “Let’s go into the lab and make sure it all works together. I’ve seen customers run mock ups of entire oil rigs with simulators.” You want to make sure there won’t be any adverse effects as you implement new technology.

“It’s not like on the office side where the technology changes every three to five years. On the industrial side people tend to be a lot more conservative. In the office environment if a printer goes down you just switch to another. In the industrial environment if a machine goes down the line stops.”

The third step is documentation. Sooner or later you’re going to have to troubleshoot the network and you need proper documentation to make that possible. You need all the layouts, all the IP addresses, blueprints and historical data.

Finally, you are ready for implementation.

“Obviously a greenfield site is easier because you start from scratch with new technology, but most implementations are migrations.”

Either way Jansons recommends a phased approach, starting with installing the infrastructure. Then you phase over part of the plant, running both networks in parallel. Finally you gradually transfer the load completely from the legacy network onto the new network.

Sounds easy right? Well, like anything, there are numerous pitfalls that can trip you up.

“Too often people forget about the word ‘industrial,’” says Bryant. “The plant floor is not the back office or home and in keeping with that Industrial Ethernet is not the same IT and home networks typically are installed in controlled environments."  Industrial Ethernet requires the same ruggedization and shielding that your old field bus network required.

“The next thing people forget about is the fact that the person responsible for getting the network up and running is the automation engineer,” adds Bryant. “Because we’re talking Ethernet people think about it from an IT perspective, but at the end of the day IT isn’t always the one troubleshooting it. Considering the demanding uptime requirements of the plant-floor, there really isn’t time to call in IT every time there is a glitch or a change. So you need to think about what the automation engineer is going to need. What tools is he familiar with? Where does he want his diagnostics data?”

Siemens has specifically designed its Ethernet products with the automation engineer in mind, says Rajani. “For example, with our products you can set up devices to act like I/O devices, which makes it easier for the automation engineer. The software package you use to set up your PLCs configures your switches, which are set up as an I/O drop on the network. So whatever diagnostics you desire from your switch can come directly into the PLC. This allows existing HMI already in use to easily display this data directly to the operator.”

“It’s not really, ‘hook up the cable and it’s all good’,” adds Jansons. “Take a little bit of time, think it through and design it properly. Industrial Ethernet has a lot of advantages and you just have to give it the same due diligence you would if you were putting in something else.”


Ethernet Timeline
• 1973: Ethernet invented at Xerox PARC
• 1980: Digital Equipment Corp., Intel and Xerox release a standard for 10M bit/sec Ethernet
• 1991: 802.3 10BaseT standards is approved, for 10M Ethernet over twisted pair telephone wire
• 1995: 802.3 100Base-T 100 M Ethernet standards is approved
• 1998: 802.3ac Gigabit Ethernet standard is approved
• 1999: 802.11b standard approved, for 11M wireless Ethernet
• 2002: 802.3ae 10G Ethernet standard is approved
• 2003: 802.11g standard approved, for 54M wireless Ethernet
• 2009: 802.11n standard expected to be approved for 600M wireless Ethernet
• 2010: 100G Ethernet expected to be approved


Industrial Ethernet Resources:
• The Industrial Ethernet Advisory Group, a resource and community that covers all aspects of Industrial Ethernet, including a forum for technical support and queries, news and events, articles and product information. www.industrialethernet.org
• An explanation of Industrial Ethernet and its various components from Siemens, a major Industrial Ethernet supplier: http://tinyurl.com/ddo93u
• Industrial Ethernet, 2nd Edition, by Perry S. Marshall and John S. Rinaldi, a reference tool on installation and troubleshooting of Industrial Ethernet networks. The book is intended to help readers “prepare to plan industrial Ethernet installations with realistic expectations, make knowledgeable purchasing decisions, and identify and prevent common causes of failure.”
• Industrial Ethernet on the Plant Floor: A Planning and Installation Guide, by Robert Lounsbury, also provides guidance on how to plan an Industrial Ethernet network, including a discussion of network architectures, components, product selection and the basics of noise.

Sponsored Recommendations

Why Go Beyond Traditional HMI/SCADA

Traditional HMI/SCADAs are being reinvented with today's growing dependence on mobile technology. Discover how AVEVA is implementing this software into your everyday devices to...

4 Reasons to move to a subscription model for your HMI/SCADA

Software-as-a-service (SaaS) gives you the technical and financial ability to respond to the changing market and provides efficient control across your entire enterprise—not just...

Is your HMI stuck in the stone age?

What happens when you adopt modern HMI solutions? Learn more about the future of operations control with these six modern HMI must-haves to help you turbocharge operator efficiency...

AVEVA™ System Platform: Smarter, Faster Operations for Enhanced Industrial Performance

AVEVA System Platform (formerly Wonderware) delivers a responsive, modern operations visualization framework designed to enhance performance across all devices with context-aware...