DuPont Shares Safety Best Practices

June 27, 2013
At Siemens’ 2013 Automation Summit, DuPont explained its safety philosophy and outlined several of its best practices.

Considering the company’s origins in the manufacture of gun powder, safety has played a large role in DuPont’s operations over the past two centuries. Building on that history, automation and process controls engineer designer Karl Stevens is responsible for adhering to Dupont’s safety standards in the systems he designs and oversees.

During his presentation explaining his role in maintaining safety at DuPont, Stevens shared several of the company’s safety philosophies and best practices. For example, Stevens says that DuPont insists on “separating safety and non-safety devices. BPCS (business planning and control systems) and SIS (safety instruments systems) do not share the same sensor point. Separate systems avoid common cause failures.”

Some of the best practice tips Stevens shared include:
• Use appropriate trays for safety wiring. Separate signal cabling (4-20mA) from power cabling (600v), otherwise you’ll violate NEC 2005 code.
• Identify safety cabling at the source, especially if that “cable terminates in a non-safety cabinet,” he says.
• Safety grounding can be tied into a common grounding system per NEC section 250.94.
• Mount safety controllers and other safety hardware in a separate cabinet from non-safety hardware or provide a steel barrier between cabinet sections.
• Create and maintain SIS change documents to track updates and changes.
• As simple as it may sound: Train personnel in safety applications.
• Create appropriate DCS/PLC design guides that show various interlock schemes.
• Use approved safety equipment that’s been tested.
• Incorporate safety into P&IDs (piping and instrumentation diagrams).

Stevens also noted the benefits DuPont has achieved from  Siemens’ Safety Matrix application. Embedded in Siemens’ Simatic PCS7 Failsafe process safety system, the software “shows safety conflicts in your system design,” Stevens says. Safety Matrix uses a common database structure (.csv files) to unite the disparate safety lifecycle tools commonly found in a plant environment. The software automatically extracts the details of each cause (input) and effect (output) and generates a single TÜV-certified function block for the controller.

About the Author

David Greenfield, editor in chief | Editor in Chief

David Greenfield joined Automation World in June 2011. Bringing a wealth of industry knowledge and media experience to his position, David’s contributions can be found in AW’s print and online editions and custom projects. Earlier in his career, David was Editorial Director of Design News at UBM Electronics, and prior to joining UBM, he was Editorial Director of Control Engineering at Reed Business Information, where he also worked on Manufacturing Business Technology as Publisher. 

Sponsored Recommendations

Rock Quarry Implements Ignition to Improve Visibility, Safety & Decision-Making

George Reed, with the help of Factory Technologies, was looking to further automate the processes at its quarries and make Ignition an organization-wide standard.

Water Infrastructure Company Replaces Point-To-Point VPN With MQTT

Goodnight Midstream chose Ignition because it could fulfill several requirements: data mining and business intelligence work on the system backend; powerful Linux-based edge deployments...

The Purdue Model And Ignition

In the automation world, the Purdue Model (also known as the Purdue reference model, Purdue network model, ISA 95, or the Automation Pyramid) is a well-known architectural framework...

Creating A Digital Transformation Roadmap Using A Unified Namespace

Digital Transformation has become one of the most popular buzzwords in the automation industry, often used to describe any digital improvements to industrial technology. But what...