Introducing the Open Process Automation Forum. Finally.

Jan. 4, 2017
ExxonMobil has spent a lot of its own energy convincing the automation community that there is a need for a standards-based control architecture. Now, under the umbrella of The Open Group, a new member forum promises to deliver on that vision.

A new year represents a fresh start for many individuals. It’s a chance to forget the missteps of the past and express optimism about the opportunities ahead. For process manufacturers, New Year’s resolutions mean finally finding a way to extract more value from their control systems.

This past year we’ve heard a lot from folks at ExxonMobil who have been on a crusade to get vendors to collaborate on an open architecture that is modular, interoperable and scalable. Well, looks like automation suppliers have been listening and they are willing to cooperate with ExxonMobil and the other manufacturers jumping on the open standards bandwagon. More importantly, it seems that suppliers are willing to work with their competitors.

Here’s the big news: 2017 marks the kick off of the Open Process Automation Forum, a working group within The Open Group, a vendor- and technology-neutral industry consortium. The new Open Process Automation Forum is focused on developing a standards-based, secure and interoperable process control architecture that can be leveraged across multiple industries including oil and gas, petrochemical, mining and metals, pulp and paper, food and beverage, pharmaceutical and utilities.

The concept itself is not new, as it is already playing out in The Open Group’s IT4IT Forum, which is building a vendor-neutral reference architecture for managing the business of IT. Similarly, The Open Group’s Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE) is defining approaches for using open standards with avionics systems.

Having seen these other initiatives, ExxonMobil approached The Open Group and, since last March, they’ve been working together on building a “coalition of the willing,” culminating in the first meeting of the minds this past November.

In attendance at that first meeting were 57 individuals from 30 different organizations, many of which have already joined the Forum, including ABB, Aspen Technology, BASF, Dow Chemical, Emerson Process, Inductive Automation, Merck & Co., Schneider Electric, Siemens, Shell, Yokogawa and more.

At that initial meeting, there were a few important takeaways, including:

  • There are common pain points spanning multiple sectors such as aging control systems and the need for more rapid technology insertion, which the proposed standards effort can address.
  • There are common pain points shared by suppliers in current business models.
  • The supplier community is willing to work collaboratively on an open standard for process control.
  • The participants had a common understanding that a “win-win” outcome providing benefits to end users and suppliers is essential, and the members of the Forum want to deliver on this.

During the meeting, the scope of the standards was discussed, and interim co-chairs of the Forum were appointed, including Don Bartusiak of ExxonMobil and Trevor Cusworth of Schneider Electric. In addition, workgroups were formed for business, enterprise architecture and the technical standard.

There is also an ongoing call to action to manufacturers, suppliers, academics, system integrators and others who want to help influence the direction of the standards development, which current Forum participants are calling a “renaissance” that will be transformational to the process industry.

According to the Forum website, as of early this month there were 93 members—and growing—as the organization prepares for its official launch at The Open Group San Francisco meeting and again during the ARC Industry Forum meeting in early February.

So we are starting off 2017 on a great foot with high hopes and positive expectations. But as with any New Year’s resolution, it takes commitment, accountability and follow through to get results. Now the hard work begins.

About the Author

Stephanie Neil | Editor-in-Chief, OEM Magazine

Stephanie Neil has been reporting on business and technology for over 25 years and was named Editor-in-Chief of OEM magazine in 2018. She began her journalism career as a beat reporter for eWeek, a technology newspaper, later joining Managing Automation, a monthly B2B manufacturing magazine, as senior editor. During that time, Neil was also a correspondent for The Boston Globe, covering local news. She joined PMMI Media Group in 2015 as a senior editor for Automation World and continues to write for both AW and OEM, covering manufacturing news, technology trends, and workforce issues.

Sponsored Recommendations

Why Go Beyond Traditional HMI/SCADA

Traditional HMI/SCADAs are being reinvented with today's growing dependence on mobile technology. Discover how AVEVA is implementing this software into your everyday devices to...

4 Reasons to move to a subscription model for your HMI/SCADA

Software-as-a-service (SaaS) gives you the technical and financial ability to respond to the changing market and provides efficient control across your entire enterprise—not just...

Is your HMI stuck in the stone age?

What happens when you adopt modern HMI solutions? Learn more about the future of operations control with these six modern HMI must-haves to help you turbocharge operator efficiency...